I wanted a MacBook Air and already had two external displays which I wanted to keep using.
#DISPLAYLINK USB GRAPHICS ADAPTER NOT MAC#
For the Mac Mini, you can add two displays. For the MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, and iMac that means you can connect one additional display along with the built-in display. I couldn’t bring myself to buy a legacy Intel Mac, but the new M1 Macs only support up to two displays. ganeshts: The NAND part of the quoted tweet is factually wrong.- Projects Understanding DisplayLink, multiple displays, and M1 Macs Introduction.RyanSmithAT: RT My team and I have spent a huge amount of time over the past year+ getting XeSS into games, so I'm stoked that we're final….A 16 core Zen 4 chip that turbos up to 5.7GHz is g… RyanSmithAT: AMD is definitely working on underpromissing and overdelivering.gavbon86: RT AMD EXPO Memory Technology: One Click Overclocking Profiles For Ryzen 7000.gavbon86: Quick list of our Ryzen 7000 (Zen 4) and AM5 content/announcements.It's been corrected, apologies for the doozy. gavbon86: Hi, it was an error in the table, not sure what happened there.Arm is suing Qualcomm/Nuvia around Arm architecture licensing… RyanSmithAT: Well today is a very awkward day, on multiple levels.
#DISPLAYLINK USB GRAPHICS ADAPTER NOT ANDROID#
RyanSmithAT: As for Arm/QC/Nuvia, either this gets settled quickly or it's going to be as ugly as all heck for the Arm Android a….gavbon86: Oh it's a massive step up 🙄.Source: DisplayLink, DisplayLink, SemiAccurate Samsung also introduced Central Station ( our analysis) a while back, which is an equivalent docking station concept. Apple's Thunderbolt Display ( our review) is definitely an interesting concept and DisplayLink takes a similar approach with DL-3900. It's evident that there is a lot compression going on in order to provide 2560x1600 over USB 3.0 in the first place. That should be enough for most users, although it will be interesting to see how the DL-3900 performs with multiple devices. While USB 3.0 can't deliver the same bandwidth as Thunderbolt, it's still capable of 5Gb/s (theoretically), which is ten times more than USB 2.0. It's again good to note that DisplayLink only manufactures the chips - pricing and availability depend on the OEM. DisplayLink lists only "available soon" on their site, so availability is unknown as well.
SemiAccurate is claiming about $80 for the USB to HDMI adapter and $150 for the dock. At IDF, DisplayLink showed off a prototype with DVI, HDMI, two USB 3.0 ports and an Ethernet port. Both adapters support multi-channel audio and 3D video playback.ĭisplayLink has not revealed official pricing.
DisplayLink only manufactures the chips (just like AMD and NVIDIA for example), so the final configuration is dependent on the OEM. Resolution support is up to 2560x1600, or two 1920x1080 displays. On top of that, it supports networking and can act as a USB 3.0 hub. It's more like a docking station since the actual chip supports DisplayPort, VGA, DVI and HDMI. The second one, DL-3900, is a bit more than just a video adapter. It doesn't seem much different from what USB 2.0 video adapters offer, but the added bandwidth should help with more intensive content, such as videos. The first one is a regular USB to HDMI adapter and supports resolutions of up to 2048x1152, meaning that it's sufficient for all today's HDMI monitors. There will be two models: DL-3500 and DL-3900. One thing we missed was DisplayLink's announcement of their first USB 3.0 video adapters. Although IDF 2011 ended two weeks ago, not everything has been covered yet.
0 kommentar(er)
